<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tom Haczewski | Norwich Web Developer | Online portfolio and CV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk</link>
	<description>Home of Tom Haczewski, Creative Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Royal Mail &#8211; Good riddance by Beverley Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2009/10/31/royal-mail-good-riddance/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverley Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=87#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

I completely agree with you. But don&#039;t just stop with the postal workers, I am fed up with hearing from all whinging public sector workers complaining that their pay increases are not enough. Personally, as a self employed person, if times are tough I have to draw my belt in. I don&#039;t get help from government handouts and I certainly don&#039;t get a little letter telling how much my pay increment will be this year. When times get tough I have to, at best, leave my prices the same and front the increases in tax, fuel bills etc out of my earnings.

I think the time has come for a Thatcherite approach on the public sector. If you don&#039;t like the conditions find another job, there are thousands of others who would be glad of it.

Phew, rant over ... Bev ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>I completely agree with you. But don&#8217;t just stop with the postal workers, I am fed up with hearing from all whinging public sector workers complaining that their pay increases are not enough. Personally, as a self employed person, if times are tough I have to draw my belt in. I don&#8217;t get help from government handouts and I certainly don&#8217;t get a little letter telling how much my pay increment will be this year. When times get tough I have to, at best, leave my prices the same and front the increases in tax, fuel bills etc out of my earnings.</p>
<p>I think the time has come for a Thatcherite approach on the public sector. If you don&#8217;t like the conditions find another job, there are thousands of others who would be glad of it.</p>
<p>Phew, rant over &#8230; Bev <img src='http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voluntary project launched by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2010/01/31/voluntary-project-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=110#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Well done tom, I know it hasn&#039;t always been easy but the end result does look pretty cool and is something to be proud of. You better teach me some silverstripe before you leave - something else for the handover list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done tom, I know it hasn&#8217;t always been easy but the end result does look pretty cool and is something to be proud of. You better teach me some silverstripe before you leave &#8211; something else for the handover list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voluntary project launched by Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2010/01/31/voluntary-project-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=110#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Spotted it - in the boots?

It&#039;s a nice-looking site, good going to the both of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted it &#8211; in the boots?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice-looking site, good going to the both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 reasons why Bing won&#8217;t win the Search Wars by Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2009/09/19/5-reasons-why-bing-wont-win-the-search-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=56#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Did you hear that google are also planning to bring out a phone to rival the iPhone? http://www.android.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear that google are also planning to bring out a phone to rival the iPhone? <a href="http://www.android.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.android.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Cufon with BBC&#8217;s Glow JS library by Tweets that mention Using Cufon with BBC’s Glow JS library « Tom Haczewski &#124; Norwich Web Developer &#124; Online portfolio and CV -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2009/11/01/using-cufon-with-bbcs-glow-js-library/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Using Cufon with BBC’s Glow JS library « Tom Haczewski &#124; Norwich Web Developer &#124; Online portfolio and CV -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=90#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tom Haczewski, BBC Glow. BBC Glow said: taking a look at Cufón with BBC Glow http://bit.ly/4FHtoz (via @thehacksaw) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tom Haczewski, BBC Glow. BBC Glow said: taking a look at Cufón with BBC Glow <a href="http://bit.ly/4FHtoz" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4FHtoz</a> (via @thehacksaw) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Cufon with BBC&#8217;s Glow JS library by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2009/11/01/using-cufon-with-bbcs-glow-js-library/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=90#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I guess the Glow library isn&#039;t well enough established yet, which is why Cufon isn&#039;t able to detect it. Good work with the fix, you should tell the BBC guys too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the Glow library isn&#8217;t well enough established yet, which is why Cufon isn&#8217;t able to detect it. Good work with the fix, you should tell the BBC guys too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is code validation really that important? by Tom Haczewski</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2009/09/05/is-code-validation-really-that-important/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Haczewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=51#comment-14</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - Google doesn&#039;t validate, and they bytes they save are crucially important. On average, Google handles 91 million searches per day, and for their infrastructure to cope (and as mentioned on my next post, be as fast as possible to beat competition) they have to conserve as much as possible.

The difference is that Google have done this on purpose - they haven&#039;t slacked off or forgotten to validate, it&#039;s a calculated move which has a real impact on their service.

So you&#039;re definitely right that it doesn&#039;t validate - but it&#039;s for a good reason. Plus, Google pretty much rule the internets, and I&#039;m not going to argue with them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; Google doesn&#8217;t validate, and they bytes they save are crucially important. On average, Google handles 91 million searches per day, and for their infrastructure to cope (and as mentioned on my next post, be as fast as possible to beat competition) they have to conserve as much as possible.</p>
<p>The difference is that Google have done this on purpose &#8211; they haven&#8217;t slacked off or forgotten to validate, it&#8217;s a calculated move which has a real impact on their service.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re definitely right that it doesn&#8217;t validate &#8211; but it&#8217;s for a good reason. Plus, Google pretty much rule the internets, and I&#8217;m not going to argue with them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is code validation really that important? by Worz</title>
		<link>http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/2009/09/05/is-code-validation-really-that-important/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Worz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomhaczewski.co.uk/?p=51#comment-13</guid>
		<description>An example of a website not validating their code is probably the best known...google.

They say the bytes that are saved by not closing certain tags on their pages is important.  I&#039;ll leave you to make up you mind on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An example of a website not validating their code is probably the best known&#8230;google.</p>
<p>They say the bytes that are saved by not closing certain tags on their pages is important.  I&#8217;ll leave you to make up you mind on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
